In the second most common dystrophy associated with predominant pelvic and shoulder girdle muscle weakness termed Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD), genetic complexity, large phenotypic variability, and clinical overlap can result in extensive diagnostic delays in certain individuals. In view of the large strides genetics has taken in this day and age, we address the question if muscle biopsies can still provide diagnostic evidence of substance for these patients. We reviewed and reanalyzed muscle biopsy characteristics in a cohort of LGMD patient pairs in which gene variants were picked up in CAPN3, FKRP, TTN, and ANO5, using histochemical-immunohistochemical-and immunofluorescent staining, and western blotting. We found that not the nature and severity of inflammatory changes, but the changed properties of the dystrophin complex were the most valuable assets to differentiate LGMD from myositis. Proteomic evaluation brought both primary and secondary deficiencies to light, which could be equally revealing for diagnosis. Though a muscle biopsy might, at present, not always be strictly necessary anymore, it still represents an irrefutable asset when the genetic diagnosis is complicated.
Keywords: Diagnostic muscle biopsy; Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy; Muscle inflammation; Muscular dystrophy; Myopathology.
© 2021. Belgian Neurological Society.