Decision regret, adverse outcomes, and treatment choice in men with localized prostate cancer: Results from a multi-site randomized trial

Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;39(8):493.e9-493.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.038. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

Abstract

Introduction: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer must navigate a highly preference-sensitive decision between treatment options with varying adverse outcome profiles. We evaluated whether use of a decision support tool previously shown to decrease decisional conflict also impacted the secondary outcome of post-treatment decision regret.

Methods: Participants were randomized to receive personalized decision support via the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate or usual care prior to a final treatment decision. Symptoms were measured just before randomization and 6 months later; decision regret was measured at 6 months along with records review to ascertain treatment choices. Regression modeling explored associations between baseline variables including race and D`Amico risk, study group, and 6-month variables regret, choice, and symptoms.

Results: At 6 months, 287 of 392 (73%) men returned questionnaires of which 257 (89%) had made a treatment choice. Of that group, 201 of 257 (78%) completely answered the regret scale. Regret was not significantly different between participants randomized to the P3P intervention compared to the control group (P = 0.360). In univariate analyses, we found that Black men, men with hormonal symptoms, and men with bowel symptoms reported significantly higher decision regret (all P < 0.01). Significant interactions were detected between race and study group (intervention vs. usual care) in the multivariable model; use of the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate was associated with significantly decreased decisional regret among Black men (P = 0.037). Interactions between regret, symptoms and treatment revealed that (1) men choosing definitive treatment and reporting no hormonal symptoms reported lower regret compared to all others; and (2) men choosing active surveillance and reporting bowel symptoms had higher regret compared to all others.

Conclusion: The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support tool may be most beneficial in minimizing decisional regret for Black men considering treatment options for newly-diagnosed prostate cancer.

Trial registration: NCT01844999.

Keywords: Decision regret; Decision support techniques; Prostate cancer.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Choice Behavior*
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Decision Making / physiology*
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Emotions / physiology*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Long Term Adverse Effects / etiology
  • Long Term Adverse Effects / pathology*
  • Male
  • Prognosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01844999