Back loading estimation during team handling: Is the use of only motion data sufficient?

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0244405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244405. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Analyzing back loading during team manual handling tasks requires the measurement of external contacts and is thus limited to standardized tasks. This paper evaluates the possibility of estimating L5/S1 joint moments based solely on motion data. Ten subjects constituted five two-person teams and handling tasks were analyzed with four different box configurations. Three prediction methods for estimating L5/S1 joint moments were evaluated by comparing them to a gold standard using force platforms: one used only motion data, another used motion data and the traction/compression force applied to the box and one used motion data and the ground reaction forces of one team member. The three prediction methods were based on a contact model with an optimization-based method. Using only motion data did not allow an accurate estimate due to the traction/compression force applied by each team member, which affected L5/S1 joint moments. Back loading can be estimated using motion data and the measurement of the traction/compression force with relatively small errors, comparable to the uncertainty levels reported in other studies. The traction/compression force can be obtained directly with a force measurement unit built into the object to be moved or indirectly by using force platforms on which one of the two handlers stands during the handling task. The use of the proposed prediction methods allows team manual handling tasks to be analyzed in various realistic contexts, with team members who have different anthropometric measurements and with different box characteristics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lifting
  • Lumbosacral Region / physiology*
  • Male
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Weight-Bearing / physiology*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study was partly supported by a scholarship program from the IRSST to AM and supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to PC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.