A Randomized Controlled Trial Measuring Effects of Extra Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefits on Child Food Security in Low-Income Families in Rural Kentucky

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Jan;121(1S):S9-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.05.017.

Abstract

Background: To reduce childhood hunger, the US Department of Agriculture funded several innovative demonstration projects, including the Kentucky Ticket to Healthy Food project.

Objective: The study tested the hypothesis that Ticket to Healthy Food would reduce child food insecurity (FI-C) among rural, low-income households.

Design: The study used a randomized controlled trial in which households were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. Outcomes were measured using household surveys and administrative data. Survey data were collected at baseline (n=2,202) and follow-up (n=1,639) 8 to 11 months into the project.

Participants/setting: Households in 17 counties in southeastern Kentucky that had at least 1 child younger than 18 years and received a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit amount less than the maximum at baseline.

Intervention: Between January 2017 and March 2018, treatment households on SNAP received additional monthly benefits ranging from $1 to $122 based on distance to grocery store and earned income.

Main outcome measures: Key outcomes included FI-C (primary), food insecurity among adults and households, and food expenditures (secondary).

Statistical analyses performed: Logistic and linear regression models were used to estimate differences between the treatment and control groups, controlling for baseline characteristics. Socioeconomic subgroups were also analyzed.

Results: The Kentucky Ticket to Healthy Food project did not reduce the primary outcome, FI-C (treatment=37.1%, control=35.2%; P=0.812), or secondary outcomes of very low food security among children (treatment=3.7%, control=4.4%; P=0.204) or food insecurity among adults (treatment=53.9%, control=53.0%; P=0.654). The project increased households' monthly food spending by $20 (P=0.030) and led more households to report that monthly benefits lasted at least 3 weeks (treatment=65%, control=56%; P=0.009).

Conclusion: A demonstration project to reduce FI-C by raising SNAP benefits for Kentucky households with children did not reduce FI-C or other food insecurity measures. Future research should explore the effect of different increases in SNAP benefits and collect repeated measures of FI-C to assess whether intervention effects change over time.

Funding/support: This article is published as part of a supplement supported by the US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.

Keywords: Food expenditures; Food security; Hunger; Randomized trial; SNAP.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Child
  • Child Nutrition Disorders / prevention & control*
  • Family Characteristics
  • Female
  • Food Assistance / economics
  • Food Assistance / statistics & numerical data*
  • Food Security / economics*
  • Food Security / methods
  • Humans
  • Kentucky
  • Male
  • Poverty / economics
  • Poverty / statistics & numerical data*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Regression Analysis
  • Rural Population / statistics & numerical data*