Paroxysmal events are usually not directly observed by physicians. The diagnosis remains challenging and relies mostly on the description of witnesses. The effectiveness of videos for seizure diagnosis has been validated by several studies, but their place in clinical practice is not yet clear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life use of videos by child neurologists. We conducted a three-month prospective study in which child neurologists were asked to use a short questionnaire to evaluate all videos that were watched in their clinical practice for an initial diagnosis or during follow-up. A click-off meeting during the French pediatric neurology meeting allowed to recruit participants. A total of 165 questionnaires were completed by 15 physicians over the study period. The physicians were child neurologists working in secondary and tertiary/university hospitals, consulting children with epilepsy. Based on the evaluation of child neurologists, 51% of the videos consisted of epileptic seizures; 40%, nonepileptic paroxysmal events; and 9%, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Most of the videos were made on parental initiative. The use of video has modified the first diagnosis hypothesis in 35% of cases. The physicians' feelings regarding the interest of the video used during the diagnostic phase were similar to those of the video used during follow-up. It appears that videos have become a part of the epilepsy clinic and are helpful for diagnosis as well as during follow-up. Unfortunately, one of the limitations of this study is the absence of private practitioner.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Epilepsy, epileptic seizures; Video.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.