Background: Heel sticks account for most blood tests performed in neonates without analgesia because topical local anesthetics are ineffective on heel glabrous skin. We investigated the antinociceptive effect of an alternative topical analgesic, a vapocoolant spray, on hind paw glabrous skin of rat pups. The spray was applied by two methods: method 1 for 4 s at a distance of 8 cm and method 2 for 10 s at a distance of 18 cm.
Methods: The rat pups were randomized to either method 1 (n = 32) or method 2 (n = 31). Vapocoolant spray was applied to one hind paw randomly, and saline spray was applied to the contralateral paw. The paws were exposed to a hotplate test to measure withdrawal latency time before and 30 s after the spray applications. Additionally, rat pups were tested for tissue toxicity in method 1 (n = 20) and method 2 (n = 20) after application of the vapocoolant spray before heel sticks three times a day for two consecutive days. Analyses of spray and method effects on hotplate withdrawal latency time were determined by nonparametric Wilcoxon tests to assess paired difference between vapocoolant spray and saline spray and to compare difference in medians between the two methods.
Results: Method 1 and method 2 vapocoolant spray applications significantly prolonged the withdrawal latency time compared with saline, a median difference of 0.6 s (IQR 0.1-1.2) for method 1 and 9.5 s (IQR 5.5-10.7) for method 2 (a 15-fold longer latency time with method 2). Method-2 produced significantly longer withdrawal latency time than method 1 with a difference in median time of 8.9 s (CI: 95% 7.3-10.4 s, P < .0001). No histopathological changes were detected.
Conclusions: Compared with method- 1, the vapocoolant spray in method 2 produced significantly longer withdrawal latency time that is clinically applicable to collecting blood samples after a heel stick.
Keywords: efficacy; heel stick; rat pups; topical anesthetic; toxicity.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.