[Efficacy and safety of Changsulin® compared with Lantus® in type 2 diabetes: a phasemulticenter, randomized, open-label, parallel, controlled clinical trial]

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 1;59(12):960-967. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200423-00417.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Changsulin® with Lantus® in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: This was a phase Ⅲ, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled clinical trial. A total of 578 participants with T2DM inadequately controlled on oral hypoglycemic agents were randomized 3∶1 to Changsulin® or Lantus® treatment for 24 weeks. The efficacy measures included changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2h postprandial plasma glucose (2hPG), 8-point self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) profiles from baseline, and proportions of subjects achieving targets of HbA1c and FPG. The safety outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia, adverse events (AEs) and anti-insulin glargine antibody. Results: After 24 weeks of treatment, mean HbAlc decreased 1.16% and 1.25%, FPG decreased 3.05 mmol/L and 2.90 mmol/L, 2hPG decreased 2.49 mmol/L and 2.38 mmol/L in Changsulin® and in Lantus®, respectively. No significant differences could be viewed in above parameters between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were also no significant differences between Changsulin® and Lantus® in 8-point SMBG profiles from baseline and proportions of subjects achieving the targets of HbA1c and FPG (all P>0.05). The rates of total hypoglycemia (38.00% and 39.01% for Changsulin® and Lantus®, respectively) and nocturnal hypoglycemia (17.25% and 16.31% for Changsulin® and Lantus®, respectively) were similar between the two groups (all P>0.05). Most of the hypoglycemia events were asymptomatic, and no severe hypoglycemia were found in both groups. No differences were observed in rates of AEs (61.77% vs.52.48%) and anti-insulin glargine antibody (after 24 weeks of treatment, 6.91% vs.3.65%) between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Changsulin® shows similar efficacy and safety profiles compared with Lantus® and Changsulin® treatment was well tolerated in patients with T2DM.

目的: 比较长舒霖®和来得时®治疗2型糖尿病的有效性和安全性。 方法: 多中心、随机、开放、平行组、阳性药物对照、Ⅲ期临床研究,入选578例口服降糖药血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,按区组分段随机方法将受试者按3∶1的比例随机进入长舒霖®组和来得时®组,治疗24周。比较两组治疗前后糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、标准餐后2h血糖(2hPG)、8点指尖血糖谱、结束时HbA1c和FPG达标率以及低血糖事件、不良事件的发生率和甘精胰岛素特异性抗体阳性率。 结果: 治疗24周后长舒霖®组与来得时®组的HbA1c分别下降1.16%和1.25%,FPG分别下降3.05 mmol/L和2.90 mmol/L, 2hPG分别下降2.49 mmol/L和2.38 mmol/L,上述指标两组比较差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。两组治疗前后8点指尖血糖谱以及结束时HbA1c和FPG达标率相似(P值均>0.05)。长舒霖®组与来得时®组总体低血糖发生率 (38.00%和39.01%)和夜间低血糖发生率(17.25%和16.31%)差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05),大部分为无症状性低血糖,两组均无重度低血糖。两组不良事件发生率(61.77%比52.48%)和甘精胰岛素特异性抗体阳性率(24周时6.91%比3.65%)差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。 结论: 长舒霖®治疗2型糖尿病的有效性和安全性与来得时®相当,并具有良好的耐受性。.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Efficacy; Insulin glargine; Safety.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Blood Glucose / analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy
  • Glycated Hemoglobin / analysis
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemia
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Insulin Glargine / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Glycated Hemoglobin A
  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Insulin Glargine