Objectives: To assess and analyse the concordance between post-mortem findings and in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) in the MERIDIAN (MRI to enhance the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities in utero) cohort.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Fetal medicine units in the UK.
Population: Pregnant women with a diagnosis of fetal brain abnormality identified on ultrasound at 18 weeks of gestation or later.
Methods: All pregnancies from the MERIDIAN study that resulted in a abortion were included and the rate of uptake and success of post-mortem examinations were calculated. In the cases in which diagnostic information about the fetal brain was obtained by post-mortem, the results were compared with the diagnoses from iuMRI.
Main outcome measure: Outcome reference diagnosis from post-mortem examination.
Results: A total of 155 from 823 pregnancies (19%) ended in a termination of pregnancy and 71 (46%) had post-mortem brain examinations, 62 of which were diagnostically adequate. Hence, the overall rate of successful post-mortem investigation was 40%, and for those cases there was a concordance rate of 84% between iuMRI and post-mortem examination. Detailed information is provided when the results of the post-mortem examination and the iuMRI study differed.
Conclusions: We have shown tissue-validation of radiological diagnosis is hampered by a low rate of post-mortem studies in fetuses aborted with brain abnormalities, a situation further compounded by a 12% rate of autopsy being technically unsuccessful. The agreement between iuMRI and post-mortem findings is high, but our analysis of the discrepant cases provides valuable clues for improving how we provide information for parents. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: iuMRI should be considered a reliable indicator of fetal brain abnormalities when post-mortem is not performed.
Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; fetus; magnetic resonance imaging; post-mortem.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.