Evaluation of immune and chemical precipitation methods for plasma exosome isolation

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 24;15(11):e0242732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242732. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Exosomes are a type of extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by multiple mammalian cell types and involved in intercellular communication. Numerous studies have explored the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of exosomes. The key challenge is the lack of efficient and standard techniques for isolation and downstream analysis of nanovesicles. Conventional isolation methods, such as ultracentrifugation, precipitation, filtration, chromatography, and immune-affinity-based approaches, rely on specific physical properties or on surface biomarkers. However, any of the existing methods has its limitations. Various parameters, such as efficacy, specificity, labor input, cost and scalability, and standardization options, must be considered for the correct choice of appropriate approach. The isolation of exosomes from biological fluids is especially challenged by the complex nature and variability of these liquids. Here, we present a comparison of five protocols for exosome isolation from human plasma: two chemical affinity precipitation methods (lectin-based purification and SubX™ technology), immunoaffinity precipitation, and reference ultracentrifugation-based exosome isolation method in two modifications. An approach for the isolation of exosomes based on the phenomenon of binding and aggregation of these particles via clusters of outer membrane phosphate groups in the presence of SubX™ molecules has been put forward in the present study. The isolated EVs were characterized based upon size, quantity, and protein content.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cell-Derived Microparticles / chemistry*
  • Exosomes / chemistry*
  • Humans
  • Immunoprecipitation*
  • Lectins / chemistry
  • Plasma / chemistry*
  • Ultracentrifugation*

Substances

  • Lectins

Grants and funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation project 19-74-20146. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.