JAAM nationwide survey on the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in Japan. Part II: how did medical institutions overcome the first wave and how should they prepare for the future?

Jun Oda; Takashi Muguruma; Shigenari Matsuyama; Seizan Tanabe; Tetsuro Nishimura; Yoko Sugawara; Shinji Ogura

doi:10.1002/ams2.592

JAAM nationwide survey on the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in Japan. Part II: how did medical institutions overcome the first wave and how should they prepare for the future?

Acute Med Surg. 2020 Dec 9;7(1):e592. doi: 10.1002/ams2.592. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

Authors

Jun Oda^{1

2}, Takashi Muguruma^{1

3}, Shigenari Matsuyama^{1

4}, Seizan Tanabe^{1

5}, Tetsuro Nishimura^{1

6}, Yoko Sugawara^{1

7}, Shinji Ogura^{1

8}

Affiliations

¹ Labor Management Committee Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) Tokyo Japan.
² Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tokyo Medical University Shinjuku-ku Japan.
³ Advanced Critical Care and Emergency Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
⁴ Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Hyogo Emergency Medical Center Kobe Japan.
⁵ Foundation for Ambulance Service Development Emergency Life-Saving Technique Academy of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
⁶ Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine Graduate School of Medicine Osaka City University Osaka Japan.
⁷ Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital Minato-ku Japan.
⁸ Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine Gifu Japan.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate and clarify the surge capacity of staff/equipment/space, and patient outcome in the first wave of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Japan.

Methods: We analyzed questionnaire data from the end of May 2020 from 180 hospitals (total of 102,578 beds) with acute medical centers.

Results: A total of 4,938 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were confirmed. Of 1,100 severe COVID-19 inpatients, 112 remained hospitalized and 138 died. There were 4,852 patients presumed to be severe COVID-19 patients who were confirmed later to be not infected. Twenty-seven hospitals (15% of 180 hospitals) converted their intensive care unit (ICU) to a unit for COVID-19 patients only, and 107 (59%) had to manage both severe COVID-19 patients and others in the same ICU. Restriction of ICU admission occurred in one of the former 27 hospitals and 21 of the latter 107 hospitals. Shortage of N95 masks was the most serious concern regarding personal protective equipment. As for issues that raised ICU bed occupancy, difficulty undertaking or progressing rehabilitation for severe patients (42%), and the improved patients (28%), long-lasting severely ill patients (36%), and unclear isolation criteria (34%) were mentioned. Many acute medicine physicians assisted regional governmental agencies, functioning as advisors and volunteer coordinators.

Conclusion: The mortality rate of COVID-19 in this study was 4.1% of all hospitalized patients and 12.5% (one in eight) severe patients. The hospitals with dedicated COVID-19 ICUs accepted more patients with severe COVID-19 and had lower ICU admission restrictions, which could be helpful as a strategy in the next pandemic.

Keywords: COVID‐19; ICU management; medical staff; survey.