A decentralized framework for cultivating research lifecycle transparency

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0241496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241496. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Research transparency has been advocated as a key means of addressing the current crisis of reproducibility. This article proposes an enhanced form of research transparency, termed lifecycle transparency. Over the entire lifecycle of a research effort, this approach captures the syntactical contexts of artifacts and stakeholders, such as timestamps, agreements, and/or dependency requirements for completing each research phase. For example, such contexts might include when, where, and from whom patients' consent and institutional review board approvals were received before a clinical trial was carried out. However, as existing open-science tools are often dedicated to certain research phases or disciplines, and thus insufficient to support lifecycle transparency, we propose a novel decentralized framework to serve as a common medium for interaction among open-science tools, and produces irrefutable and immutable proofs of progress that can be verified automatically.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Artifacts
  • Blockchain
  • Communication
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Ecosystem
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stakeholder Participation*

Grants and funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan, under MOST 109-2636-E-002-021-, 109-2636-H-002-002-, and 109-3017-F-002-004, and by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan under NTU-109L900204. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.