Background: The optimal surgery for operable gastric carcinoma is still controversial. The aim of the current study was to assess the outcomes of D2 compared with D1 gastrectomy.
Study: This observational study included 80 patients with operable gastric cancer treated by D2 gastrectomy at Alexandria University Hospital between January 2010 and January 2016. Another 68 patients treated by D1 gastrectomy during the same period were included. Both groups were compared regarding operative mortality, morbidities, tumor recurrence, and 5-year survival rates.
Results: D2 gastrectomy had a significantly higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with D1 group (19.4% and 41.9% versus 6.3% and 18.8%). Mean number of LNs retrieved was statistically increased in D2 compared with D1 group with more frequency of adequate lymphadenectomy (LN retrieved > 15). D2 gastrectomy demonstrated significant lower recurrence and cancer-specific mortality rates compared with D1 group (18.6% and 14.5% versus 34.9% and 30.8%) with no significant difference in DFS and OS rates. Spleen-saving D2 gastrectomy showed no significant difference in early postoperative mortality with significant increase in DFS and OS compared with D1 gastrectomy (78.7% and 82% versus 61.5% and 64.6%).
Conclusions: D2 gastrectomy had a lower recurrence and cancer-specific mortality rates than D1 gastrectomy but it had higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates that resulted in no overall survival benefit of D2 compared with D1 gastrectomy. Spleen-saving D2 gastrectomy can be done safely in selected patients by expert surgeons without increased morbidity and mortality and better survival outcomes.
Keywords: D1 gastrectomy; D2 gastrectomy; Operable gastric cancer; Operative and oncological outcomes.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.