Molecular dynamics simulations are an invaluable tool to characterize the dynamic motions of proteins in atomistic detail. However, the accuracy of models derived from simulations inevitably relies on the quality of the underlying force field. Here, we present an evaluation of current non-polarizable and polarizable force fields (AMBER ff14SB, CHARMM 36m, GROMOS 54A7, and Drude 2013) based on the long-standing biophysical challenge of protein folding. We quantify the thermodynamics and kinetics of the β-hairpin formation using Markov state models of the fast-folding mini-protein CLN025. Furthermore, we study the (partial) folding dynamics of two more complex systems, a villin headpiece variant and a WW domain. Surprisingly, the polarizable force field in our set, Drude 2013, consistently leads to destabilization of the native state, regardless of the secondary structure element present. All non-polarizable force fields, on the other hand, stably characterize the native state ensembles in most cases even when starting from a partially unfolded conformation. Focusing on CLN025, we find that the conformational space captured with AMBER ff14SB and CHARMM 36m is comparable, but the ensembles from CHARMM 36m simulations are clearly shifted toward disordered conformations. While the AMBER ff14SB ensemble overstabilizes the native fold, CHARMM 36m and GROMOS 54A7 ensembles both agree remarkably well with experimental state populations. In addition, GROMOS 54A7 also reproduces experimental folding times most accurately. Our results further indicate an over-stabilization of helical structures with AMBER ff14SB. Nevertheless, the presented investigations strongly imply that reliable (un)folding dynamics of small proteins can be captured in feasible computational time with current additive force fields.