Background: Within peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, peritonitis remains a primary challenge for the long-term success of the technique. Proper technique training is essential, since it reduces peritonitis rates, but the adequacy of training has not been standardized. Furthermore, factors influencing training duration have not been well identified.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive training sessions of incident PD patients in our Unit from January 2001 to December 2018.
Results: Our analysis included 135 patients, 25.9% were diabetic and median Charlson index (CCI) was 4 (IQR 2-6). Above 13 sessions was chosen as the cut off between usual and prolonged training, as it was our cohort's 75th percentile: 23% (31) had an extended training duration as per our study definition and 77% (104) had a usual training duration. The number of training sessions required increased with age (Spearman Rho 0.404; p = 0.000001), diabetic status (p = 0.001), unemployment status (p = 0.046) and CCI (Spearman Rho 0.369; p = 0.00001). Neither gender, cohabitation status, scheduled PD start, education level nor referral origin, were significant factors impacting training duration. Requiring longer training (> 13 sessions) was a significant risk factor for higher peritonitis risk, but extended training was not related to a shorter technique survival.
Conclusion: Number of PD training sessions depends on the patient's age and comorbidities, but is not related to social, educational or employment status. Prolonged training duration was a statistically significant predictor of higher peritonitis risk, but it was not related to shorter permanence in PD in our series. Identifying these patients since the training period would be useful to adapt training schedule as an early prevention strategy to minimize the risk of peritonitis and plan a preemptive retraining.
Keywords: First peritonitis; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritoneal dialysis learning; Peritoneal dialysis outcome; Training.