Background and Objectives: There are weak data comparing the safety and efficacy of absorbable and permanent tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with tack-only mesh fixation. In this study, we compared recurrence and complications rates following hernia repair using either only absorbable or only permanent tacks. Methods: Data from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database were retrospectively reviewed as accessed on June 30, 2017. The query included patients 18 years of age or older, who had undergone laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh using tack-only fixation. Study groups were divided into patients who had only absorbable tacks used and those with only permanent tacks. Propensity score matching was applied to strengthen the groups. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or hernia characteristics between the groups. There were no significant differences in length of stay, hernia recurrence rate, or surgical site infection. The permanent tack group had a significantly higher rate of surgical site occurrences (SSOs), as evidenced by a higher rate of seroma formation. Conclusion: When comparing the rates of complications and recurrences between absorbable and permanent tacks in the setting of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with tack-only mesh fixation, the only significant difference found was that the permanent group had a higher rate of SSO due to seroma formation. Because this complication did not lead to an increased intervention rate, the clinical significance of this finding remains in question.
Keywords: absorbable tack; laparoscopic ventral hernia; mesh; permanent tack.