Premise: The association of carnivory (an adaptation to nutrient-poor soils) with fire has been described as a paradox, given increases in nutrient availability that often accompany fire. The nutrients that increase in availability following fire, however, may not be the same as those provided by prey and may not reduce nutrient limitation if accompanied by even greater increases in light.
Methods: Using a factorial experiment in the field, we examined how simulated fire (clipping plus nitrogen-free fertilizer addition) and prey-derived nutrient availability (prey exclusion) interacted to influence carnivorous potential in Sarracenia alata and belowground competition with its neighbors (manipulated via trenching). We hypothesized that simulated fire combined with prey exclusion would (1) increase the potential for prey capture relative to shade avoidance, hereafter, relative prey-capture potential (RPCP), and/or (2) increase belowground competition with neighboring plants.
Results: Sarracenia alata increased RPCP in response to the combination of simulated fire and prey exclusion, despite increases in phosphorus and other nutrients associated with the simulated fire treatment, suggesting that prey capture potential increases in response to increased nitrogen limitation resulting from increases in light and/or phosphorus after fire. We found no evidence of belowground competition.
Conclusions: The potential importance of carnivory in Sarracenia alata increases following fire. This result helps to explain the paradoxical association of carnivorous plants with fire by demonstrating the potential for prey-derived nutrient limitation to increase rather than decrease in response to increases in light and nutrients other than nitrogen following fire.
Keywords: Sarraceniaceae; carnivory; competition; fire; nitrogen limitation; phenotypic plasticity; phosphorus limitation; pine savanna; prey-derived nutrients.
© 2020 Botanical Society of America.