The increasing prevalence of the grapevine trunk diseases Eutypa and Botryosphaeria dieback has been attributed, in part, to abiotic stresses imposed on vineyards as production intensifies worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of water deficit irrigation practices on the infection of pruning wounds by Eutypa lata and Diplodia seriata and the subsequent rate of colonization. Two vineyard trials were conducted over two consecutive seasons in South Australia, one in the Riverland with 'Cabernet Sauvignon' with four irrigation treatments (100, 50, 25, and 12.5% of the standard irrigation program) and another in the Barossa Valley with 'Shiraz' on six rootstocks and own roots, either irrigated or not irrigated. According to leaf water potential assessments, vines with reduced irrigation were generally in water deficit and therefore subjected to stress. On the whole, incidence of wound infection and distance of colonization were similar between irrigation treatments for both pathogens, except in the Riverland, where E. lata colonized canes to a greater extent in well-watered vines than those in water deficit. Only vines on rootstock 'Ramsey' in the Barossa Valley had greater extent of colonization by E. lata in the nonirrigated vines. There was no correlation between internal staining and colonization, with both pathogens recovered to nearly 20 cm ahead of the staining. Water deficit did not increase the susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection or colonization of the subtending tissue by E. lata and D. seriata. In fact, there was evidence of lower susceptibility to colonization by E. lata in vines subjected to severe water deficit.
Keywords: disease development and spread; epidemiology; fruit; fungi; small fruits.