Comparison of Energy and Nutrient Intake vs. Estimated Needs in Warfighters: an Update

Curr Nutr Rep. 2020 Dec;9(4):405-413. doi: 10.1007/s13668-020-00336-y.

Abstract

Active members of the military must perform optimally under conditions of thermal stress and/or energy deficiency. Military dietary reference intakes (MDRIs) provide guidelines for energy and nutrient intakes but is based studies largely conducted in Army. Needs may vary by service branch and/or position. New protein recommendations have emerged, which are not reflected in MDRIs. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Compare reported dietary intake in active duty members to MDRIs and 2016 American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) sports nutrition guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Active duty members are not meeting their energy and carbohydrate needs with low-to-adequate protein intake and adequate-to-high fat intake. Other nutrients of concern are vitamin D, calcium, iron, B-vitamins, and fiber. Thermal stress increases energy needs and suppresses appetite and thus increase risk for energy and nutrition deficiencies. Energy and nutrients needs can vary by branch of armed service, job responsibility, and external stressors.

Keywords: Cold temperature; Energy availability; Energy balance; Hot temperature; Military; Operational readiness.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Calcium
  • Diet
  • Dietary Fiber
  • Eating
  • Energy Intake*
  • Humans
  • Iron
  • Nutrients
  • Nutrition Policy
  • Nutritional Status
  • Recommended Dietary Allowances*
  • Sports*
  • United States
  • Vitamin D
  • Vitamins

Substances

  • Dietary Fiber
  • Vitamins
  • Vitamin D
  • Iron
  • Calcium