Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant cerebral neoplasm carrying poor prognosis. The importance of extent of resection (EoR) in GBM patient outcomes has been argued in the literature. Previous studies included tumors in eloquent regions of the brain. This confounds the role of EoR by including patients with intrinsically worse outcomes but will be over-represented in the reduced EoR category. In a homogenous group of patients in whom GTR was considered achievable, we investigated the effect of increasing EoR on survival. A retrospective review of 51 patients was undertaken. Quantitative, volumetric analysis of pre-operative and post-operative magnetic resonance image was compared with corresponding clinical details. The primary outcome measured was post-operative overall survival. Median overall survival was 18.3 months for GTR patients compared to 11.6 months for non-GTR (p = 0.025). Median pre-operative contrast-enhancing tumor volume for GTR patients was 54.7 cm3 and 24.9 cm3 for non-GTR. Post-operative median residual tumor volume was 1.1 cm3 in the non-GTR cohort. In multivariate analyses, GTR (HR [95% CI] = 0.973 [0.954-0.994], p = 0.00559) and increasing EoR (HR [95% CI] = 0.964 [0.944-0.985], p = 0.000665) remained predictors of survival. Centile dichotomization of EoR revealed 74% (HR [95% CI] = 0.351 [0.128-0.958], p = 0.0409) as the lowest threshold conferring statistically significant survival benefit. Where technically feasible, both GTR and EoR remained as independent prognostic factors for survival. GTR remains the gold standard for surgical treatment of GBM in patients, 74% being the minimum EoR required to confer survival benefit.
Keywords: Glioblastoma; Gross total resection; Non-eloquent region; Outcome; Survival benefit; Volumetric.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.