Comparison of Zika virus inactivation methods for reagent production and disinfection methods

J Virol Methods. 2021 Jan:287:114004. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114004. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection remains a public health concern necessitating demand for long-term virus production for diagnostic assays and R&D activities. Inactivated virus constitutes an important component of the Trioplex rRT-PCR assay and serological IgM assay (MAC-ELISA). The aim of our study is to establish standard methods of ZIKV inactivation while maintaining antigenicity and RNA integrity. We tested viral supernatants by four different inactivation methods: 1. Heat inactivation at 56 °C and 60 °C; 2. Gamma-Irradiation; 3. Chemical inactivation by Beta-propiolactone (BPL) and 4. Fast-acting commercial disinfecting agents. Effectivity was measured by cytopathic effect (CPE) and plaque assay. RNA stability and antigenicity were measured by RT-PCR and MAC-ELISA, respectively. Results: Heat inactivation: Low titer samples, incubated at 56 °C for 2 h, showed neither CPE or plaques compared to high titer supernatants that required 2.5 h. Inactivation occurred at 60 °C for 60 min with all virus titers. Gamma irradiation: Samples irradiated at ≥3 Mrad for low virus concentrations and ≥5Mrad for high virus titer completely inactivated virus. Chemical Inactivation: Neither CPE nor plaques were observed with ≥0.045 % BPL inactivation of ZIKV. Disinfectant: Treatment of viral supernatants with Micro-Chem Plus™, inactivated virus in 2 min, whereas, Ethanol (70 %) and STERIS Coverage® Spray TB inactivated the virus in 5 min.

Keywords: Antigenicityty; Cytopathic effect; Inactivation; Plaque assay; RNA stability; ZIKA virus.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Disinfection
  • Humans
  • Indicators and Reagents
  • Virus Inactivation
  • Zika Virus Infection* / diagnosis
  • Zika Virus*

Substances

  • Indicators and Reagents