There is a lack of information regarding interobserver agreement on canine meningioma gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation, and on the impact of MRI on this agreement. The objectives of this retrospective, secondary analysis, observer agreement study were to describe agreement between veterinary radiation oncologists on GTV for canine intracranial meningioma, and to compare interobserver agreement between delineation based on CT alone and delineation based on fused CT-MRI. Eighteen radiation oncologists delineated GTV for 13 dogs with an imaging diagnosis of meningioma on pre- and postcontrast CT, pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), concordance index (CI), and center of volume (COV) were used to quantify interobserver agreement. Multilevel mixed models were used to examine the difference in volume, DSC, CI and COV 3D distance between CT and CT-MR imaging. The mean volume for GTV contours delineated using fused CT-MRI was larger than when CT alone was used for delineation (mean difference CT-MR - CT = 0.89 cm3, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.12, P < .001). Interobserver agreement on GTV was improved when MRI was used; the mean DSC and CI were higher, and the mean COV 3D distance was lower, when fused CT-MRI was used than when CT alone was used (P < .001 for all differences). Based on our results, fused CT-MRI is recommended for radiation therapy planning of canine intracranial meningioma.
Keywords: cross‐sectional imaging; oncology; segmentation.
© 2020 American College of Veterinary Radiology.