Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in the scarab beetle Holotrichia oblita

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0240972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240972. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPT-PCR) is commonly used to analyze gene expression, however, the accuracy of the normalized results is affected by the expression stability of reference genes. Holotrichia oblita (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) causes serious damage to crops. Reliable reference genes in H. oblita are needed for qRT-PCR analysis. Therefore, we evaluated 13 reference genes under biotic and abiotic conditions. RefFinder provided a comprehensive stability ranking, and geNorm suggested the optimal number of reference genes for normalization. RPL13a and RPL18 were the most suitable reference genes for developmental stages, tissues, and temperature treatments; RPL13a and RPS3 were the most suitable for pesticide and photoperiod treatments; RPS18 and RPL18 were the most suitable for the two sexes. We validated the normalized results using odorant-binding protein genes as target genes in different tissues. Compared with the selected suitable reference genes, the expression of OBP1 in antennae, abdomen, and wings, and OBP2 in antennae and wings were overestimated due to the instability of ACTb. These results identified several reliable reference genes in H. oblita for normalization, and are valuable for future molecular studies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Coleoptera / genetics*
  • Coleoptera / growth & development
  • Coleoptera / pathogenicity
  • Crops, Agricultural / parasitology
  • Female
  • Gene Expression Profiling / standards*
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
  • Insect Proteins / genetics*
  • Male
  • Pesticides / pharmacology
  • Photoperiod
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / standards*
  • Reference Standards
  • Temperature

Substances

  • Insect Proteins
  • Pesticides

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFD0201009), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 1908085QC137), and Anhui Technical System of Wheat Industry (Grant No. AHCYTX-02). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.