Background: All aspects of the arthroplasty pathway must be scrutinized to maximize value and eliminate unnecessary cost. Radiology providers' contracts with hospitals often call for readings of all radiographs. This policy has little effect on patient care when intraoperative radiographs are taken and used to make real-time decisions. In order to determine the value of radiologist overreads, we asked 3 questions: what was the delay between the time an intraoperative radiograph was taken and time the report was generated, were the overreads accurate, and what is the associated cost?
Methods: Two hundred hip and knee radiograph reports generated over 6 months during 391 cases were reviewed. The time the report was dictated was compared to the time taken and time of surgery completion. To determine accuracy, each overread was rated as accurate or inaccurate. The cost of the overread was determined by multiplying the number of radiographs times the radiology fee less the technical fee.
Results: Median delay between taking the radiograph and filing the report was 45 minutes (range, 0-9778 minutes). Only 31.5% were filed before completion of the procedure. And 18.0% (36/200) were considered inaccurate despite lenient criteria. The reading fee for hip radiographs was $52.00, and for knee radiographs was $38.00, representing a total cost of $10,182 in our select series. This cost projects to $43,614 annually at our facility.
Conclusion: Radiology overreads of intraoperative radiographs have no effect on real-time decision-making. In the era of value-based care, payors should stop paying for overreads and reimburse providers who actually read the films intraoperatively.
Keywords: cost analysis; economics; hip arthroplasty; knee arthroplasty; osteoarthritis.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.