Efficacy of Three Antiretroviral Regimens Initiated during Pregnancy: Clinical Experience in Rio de Janeiro

Abstract

Few studies have compared the clinical efficacy and adverse events of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens in pregnant women seeking obstetrical care. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy (virus load response), adverse events, and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of three different regimens of cART in HIV-infected pregnant women initiating treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This was a retrospective cohort study of cART-naive pregnant women who initiated either ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (atazanavir or lopinavir), efavirenz, or raltegravir plus a backbone regimen. From 2014 to 2018, 390 pregnant women were followed over time. At baseline, the median viral load (VL) for HIV was 4.1 log copies/ml. Among participants who received cART for 2 to 7 weeks, the VL decline was greater for raltegravir (2.24 log copies/ml) than for efavirenz or protease inhibitors (P < 0.001). Virologic suppression was achieved in 87% of women on raltegravir near delivery versus 73% on efavirenz and 70% on protease inhibitors (P = 0.011). Patients on raltegravir achieved virologic suppression faster than those on other regimens (P = 0.019). Overall, the HIV perinatal infection rate was 1.5%. This clinical study compared three potent and well-tolerated cART regimens and demonstrated that a higher proportion of participants on raltegravir achieved an undetectable HIV VL near delivery (P = 0.011) compared to the other arms. These findings suggest that raltegravir-containing regimens are optimal regimens for women with HIV initiating treatment late in pregnancy.

Keywords: HIV; cesarean; efavirenz; integrase inhibitors; mother-to-child transmission; nonnucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; obstetrics; perinatal transmission; pregnancy; protease inhibitors; raltegravir.