Antibody-based therapeutics targeting membrane proteins have evolved as a major modality for the treatment of cancer, inflammation and autoimmune diseases. There are numerous challenges, ranging from desired epitope expression to reliable binding/functional assays which are associated with developing antibodies for this target class. Specifically, having a robust methodology for characterizing antibody interaction with a membrane protein target is essential for providing guidance on dosing, potency and thus expected efficacy. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) has been commonly used to characterize antibodies binding to membrane protein targets. FACS provides information about the antibody-receptor complex (antibody bound to cells) and the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (KD') is elucidated by fitting the antibody-receptor binding isotherm as a function of total antibody concentration to a nonlinear regression model. Conversely, Kinetic Exclusion Assay (KinExA) has been used to measure solution-based equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of antibodies. Here, KD is determined by measuring the free antibody concentration at equilibrium in a series of solutions in which the antibody is at constant concentration and the receptor (either in the membrane or the cell) is titrated. We measured the binding affinity of the anti-CD20 antibody, Rituximab, using both FACS and KinExA. There was ~25-fold difference in the binding affinity measured by these two techniques. We have explored this discrepancy through additional experiments around the mathematical framework involved in the analysis of these two different binding assays. Finally, our study concluded that KinExA enables accurate measurement of the KD for strong protein-protein interactions (sub-nanomolar values) compared to FACS.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.