[Analysis of the evolution of those operated on with minimal access surgery in our hospital. Does it present better results than the conventional one?]

Arch Cardiol Mex. 2020 Aug 5;91(3):321-326. doi: 10.24875/ACM.20000171.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis is the most prevalent surgical pathology in cardiac surgery, and its isolated replacement has historically been performed by means of complete middle sternotomy. However, a great revolution has recently taken place, especially after the arrival of sutureless aortic prostheses that, together with a new impulse by cardiac surgery towards a less invasive course, has caused the replacement of said valve to be carried out more and more frequently due to these prostheses and minor access incisions. For this reason, we carried out a review of the cases operated on in our service from the beginning of the minimum access surgery program, comparing them with the results of the cases operated at the same time using conventional surgery.

La estenosis aórtica severa sintomática es la patología quirúrgica más prevalente en cirugía cardiaca y su sustitución aislada se ha realizado históricamente mediante esternotomía media completa. Sin embargo, se ha producido recientemente una gran revolución, especialmente tras la llegada de las prótesis aórticas sin suturas que, unido a un nuevo impulso por la cirugía cardiaca hacia un rumbo menos invasivo, ha provocado que el reemplazo de dicha válvula se lleve a cabo cada vez más frecuentemente por dichas prótesis y por incisiones de mínimo acceso. Por ello, realizamos una revisión de los casos intervenidos en nuestro servicio desde el inicio del programa de cirugía de mínimo acceso comparándolos con los resultados de los casos intervenidos en la misma época mediante cirugía convencional.

Keywords: Surgery; Minimal access; Conventional; Comparison; Results.

Publication types

  • English Abstract