Does DRO type matter?: Cycle versus resetting contingencies in eliminating responding

Abstract

Following lever-press training on variable-interval 30-s schedules, rats were exposed to three types of schedules designed to eliminate lever pressing. The first two were variations on what is called a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (DRO, "zero rate", or [target response] omission schedule) schedule. Under both variations, reinforcers were scheduled to occur in different conditions after either fixed or variable inter-reinforcer intervals (IRIs). Under one variation each lever press reset the time interval (i.e., "resetting DRO") and under the other a reinforcer delivery scheduled at the end of an IRI was cancelled by the first response during the IRI (i.e., "cycle DRO"). In another condition reinforcers were delivered independently of responding after fixed or variable time periods. Each of the DRO procedures reduced response rates quickly and to near zero across ten sessions. The time schedules also reduced responding, albeit at a slower rate. The results extend the analogy of omission training to freeoperant avoidance to shock-deletion avoidance schedules.

Keywords: Cycle; Differential reinforcement of other behavior; Nonresetting DRO; Rats; Response omission; Response-independent reinforcement.