The Effect of Dose Escalation on the Cost-Effectiveness of Etanercept and Adalimumab with Methotrexate Among Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1236.

Abstract

Background: Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) occasionally increase their doses of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, especially the monoclonal antibody origin drugs such as adalimumab and infliximab, after inadequate response to the initial dose. Previous studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of various sequences of treatment for RA in the United States but have not considered the effect of dose escalation.

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of etanercept and adalimumab by incorporating the effect of dose escalation in moderate to severe RA patients.

Methods: We adapted the open-source Innovation and Value Initiative - Rheumatoid Arthritis model, version 1.0 to separately simulate the magnitude and time to dose escalation among RA patients taking adalimumab plus methotrexate or etanercept plus methotrexate from a societal perspective and lifetime horizon. An important assumption in the model was that dose escalation would increase treatment costs through its effect on the number of doses but would have no effect on effectiveness. We estimated the dose escalation parameters using the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. We fit competing parametric survival models to model time to dose escalation and used model diagnostics to compare the fit of the competing models. We measured the magnitude of dose escalation as the percentage increase in the number of doses conditional on dose escalation. Finally, we used the parameterized model to simulate treatment sequences beginning with a TNF inhibitor (adalimumab, etanercept) followed by nonbiologic treatment.

Results: In baseline models without dose escalation, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the etanercept treatment sequence relative to the adalimumab treatment sequence was $85,593. Incorporating dose escalation increased treatment costs for each sequence, but costs increased more with adalimumab, lowering the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to $9,001. At willingness-to-pay levels of $100,000, the etanercept sequence was more cost-effective compared with the adalimumab sequence, with probability 0.55 and 0.85 in models with and without dose escalation, respectively.

Conclusions: Dose escalation has important effects on cost-effectiveness and should be considered when comparing biologic medications for the treatment of RA.

Disclosures: Funding for this study was contributed by Amgen. When this work was conducted, Incerti and Jansen were employees of Precision Health Economics, which received financial support from Amgen. Maksabedian Hernandez, Collier, Gharaibeh, and Stolshek were employees and stockholders of Amgen, and Tkacz and Moore-Schiltz were employees of IBM Watson Health, which received financial support from Amgen. Some of the results of this work were previously presented as a poster at the 2019 AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting, March 25-28, 2019, in San Diego, CA.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adalimumab / administration & dosage*
  • Adalimumab / economics
  • Adult
  • Antirheumatic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antirheumatic Agents / economics
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / drug therapy*
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / economics
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / physiopathology
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Etanercept / administration & dosage*
  • Etanercept / economics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methotrexate / administration & dosage*
  • Methotrexate / economics
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • United States

Substances

  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Adalimumab
  • Etanercept
  • Methotrexate