Background: New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective and safe in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Limited evidence is available regarding outcomes for NVAF patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register was performed. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias assessment tool. We evaluated all primary publications and secondary analyses comparing NOACs with any other OAC agent for preventing stroke in patients with both NVAF and stable CAD from phase III clinical randomized control trials. The primary outcomes were stroke, systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and the secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) death, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction (MI).
Results: Four articles with a total of 19 266 patients were included in this study. The pooled results showed a relative risk for stroke/SE with NOACs of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.97), for major bleeding 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63-1.14), for ICH 0.36 (95% CI: 0.19-0.54), for MI 1.00 (95% CI: 0.82-1.20), for CV death 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83-1.06), and for all-cause death 0.95 (95% CI: 0.85-1.07).
Conclusion: NOACs were effective in preventing stroke/SE and reducing the risk of ICH in patients with both NVAF and CAD.
Keywords: coronary artery disease; direct oral anticoagulants; new oral anticoagulants; nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.