Purpose: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a frequent cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RCA) of VT in patients with IHD and to discuss its appropriate timing and limitations.
Methods: Literature searches of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment, and PsycINFO were performed in February 2020. RCTs comparing RCA vs conventional management for VT in patients with IHD and previous or planned implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were identified. Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, VT storm, recurrent VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF), appropriate ICD therapies, and appropriate ICD shocks. Using a random-effects model, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome.
Results: A total of 6 RCTs (N = 791) met inclusion criteria. RCA was associated with significantly lower VT storm (RR 0.70; CI95% 0.51 to 0.94, p = 0.02) and appropriate ICD therapies (RR 0.69; CI95% 0.54 to 0.88, p = 0.003), including appropriate ICD shocks (RR 0.66; CI95% 0.47 to 0.92, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, and recurrent VT/VF.
Conclusions: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for VT in patients with IHD was associated with a reduced risk of VT storm, ICD therapies, and ICD shocks. There is a need for future carefully designed RCTs that incorporate improved RCA procedural aspects.
Keywords: Catheter ablation; Ischemic heart disease; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Ventricular tachycardia.