Development of a Mating Disruption Program for a Mealybug, Planococcus ficus, in Vineyards

Kent M Daane; Glenn Y Yokota; Vaughn M Walton; Brian N Hogg; Monica L Cooper; Walter J Bentley; Jocelyn G Millar

doi:10.3390/insects11090635

Development of a Mating Disruption Program for a Mealybug, Planococcus ficus, in Vineyards

Insects. 2020 Sep 16;11(9):635. doi: 10.3390/insects11090635.

Authors

Kent M Daane¹, Glenn Y Yokota¹, Vaughn M Walton², Brian N Hogg³, Monica L Cooper⁴, Walter J Bentley⁵, Jocelyn G Millar⁶

Affiliations

¹ Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA.
² Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
³ USDA-ARS, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, Albany, CA 94710, USA.
⁴ University of California Cooperative Extension, 1710 Soscol Avenue, Napa, CA 94559, USA.
⁵ Kearney Agricultural Center, University of California IPM Program, Parlier, CA 93648, USA.
⁶ Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

Abstract

The vine mealybug (VMB), Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a key insect pest of vineyards, and improvements in sustainable control of this pest are needed to meet increasing consumer demand for organically farmed products. One promising option is mating disruption. In a series of experiments conducted from 2004 to 2007, we tested the effects of mating disruption on trap captures of Pl. ficus males in pheromone-baited traps, on Pl. ficus numbers and age structure on vines, and on damage to grape clusters. From 2004 to 2005, the effects of dispenser load (mg active ingredient per dispenser) were also assessed, and dispensers were compared to a flowable formulation. Across all trials, mating disruption consistently reduced pheromone trap captures and often reduced mealybug numbers on vines and/or crop damage, regardless of the pheromone dose that was applied. Reductions in Pl. ficus densities in mating disruption plots were not accompanied by clear effects on mealybug population age structure; however, production of non-viable ovisacs by unmated females may have obscured differences in proportional representation of ovisacs. Pheromone trap captures were never lowered to zero (often called trap shut down), possibly because trials were conducted in vineyards with unusually high Pl. ficus densities. Trap-capture patterns in both treated and control plots commonly began low in April-May, increased in mid-July or August, and often decreased in September-October when post-harvest insecticides were applied. During the four-year trial, the release rate from plastic sachet dispensers was improved by industry cooperators as pheromone was released too quickly (2004) or not completely released during the season (2005-2006). The flowable formulation performed slightly better than dispensers at the same application dose. Results over all years suggest season-long coverage or late-season coverage may be as or more important than dose per hectare. Development of a dispenser with optimized season-long pheromone emission or targeted seasonal periods should be a future goal.

Keywords: Hemiptera; biological control; seasonal development; semiochemicals; sex pheromones; sustainable agriculture; vineyard pests.