Kinetic patterns of benign and malignant breast lesions on contrast enhanced digital mammogram

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239271. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the kinetic patterns of benign and malignant breast lesions using contrast-enhanced digital mammogram (CEDM).

Methods: Women with suspicious breast lesions on mammography or ultrasound were enrolled. Single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) CEDM of an affected breast was acquired at 2, 3, 4, 7, and 10 min after injection of contrast agent. Three readers visually and semi-quantitatively analyzed the enhancement of suspicious lesions. The kinetic pattern of each lesion was classified as persistent, plateau, or washout over two time intervals, 2-4 min and 2-10 min, by comparing the signal intensity at the first time interval with that at the second.

Results: There were 73 malignant and 75 benign lesions in 148 patients (mean age: 52 years). Benign and malignant breast lesions showed the highest signal intensity at 3 min and 2 min, respectively. Average areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for diagnostic accuracy based on lesion enhancement at different time points were 0.73 at 2 min, 0.72 at 3 min, 0.69 at 4 min, 0.67 at 7 min, and 0.64 at 10 min. Diagnostic performance was significantly better at 2, 3, and 4 min than at 7 and 10 min (all p < 0.05). A washout kinetic pattern was significantly associated with malignant lesions at 2-4 min and 2-10 min frames according to two of the three readers' interpretations (all p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: Applications of optimal time intervals and kinetic patterns show promise in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions on CEDM.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Contrast Media / pharmacokinetics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mammography / methods*
  • Mammography / standards
  • Mammography / statistics & numerical data
  • Middle Aged
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / methods*
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / standards
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / statistics & numerical data

Substances

  • Contrast Media

Grants and funding

This work is directly supported by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Research Found (KSVGH 108-158 and KSVGH106-137) and Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA. Hologic Inc. is a commercial company. The funders only provided support of the study in the form of research grant funding. None of authors received salary or other fees from funders. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products associated with this research to declare. The funders do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.