To determine the diagnostic performance of mean ADC values in the characterization of endometrial carcinoma (EC) from benign lesions by systematic review of the literature and performing meta-analysis. A systematic search of major electronic bibliographic databases was performed to find studies that used ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the search results and then by reading the full texts selected the pertinent studies for final analyses. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were created. Between-study heterogeneity was measured using I squared (I2) index. Eleven studies including 269 ECs and 208 benign lesions were analyzed. Pooled average (95% CI) ADC in EC and benign lesions groups were, respectively, 0.82 (0.77-0.87) × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.41 (1.29-1.52) × 10-3 mm2/s. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions were 93% (87-96%; I2 = 41.19%) and 94% (88-97%; I2 = 46.91%), respectively. The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC curve was 98% (96-99%). ADC values had good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating EC from benign lesions. In order to recommend ADC measurement for detecting endometrial lesions in routine clinical practice, more primary studies, especially trials and comparative studies including hysteroscopically-guided biopsy method, with larger sample sizes are still required.
Keywords: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Endometrial neoplasms; Meta-analysis; Sensitivity and specificity.