Governing antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review of global governance mechanisms

J Public Health Policy. 2020 Dec;41(4):515-528. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00248-9.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a central health challenge of the twenty first century, poses substantial population health risks, with deaths currently estimated to be around 700,000 per year globally. The international community has signaled its commitment to exploring and implementing effective policy responses to AMR, with a Global Action Plan on AMR approved by the World Health Assembly in 2015. Major governance challenges could thwart collective efforts to address AMR, along with limited knowledge about how to design effective global governance mechanisms. To identify common ground for more coordinated global actions we conducted a narrative review to map dominant ideas and academic debates about AMR governance. We found two categories of global governance mechanisms: binding and non-binding and discuss advantages and drawbacks of each. We suggest that a combination of non-binding and binding governance mechanisms supported by leading antimicrobial use countries and important AMR stakeholders, and informed by One Health principles, may be best suited to tackle AMR.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Global governance; Health regulations; International law.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Anti-Infective Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Clinical Governance*
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial* / drug effects
  • Global Health
  • Humans

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Anti-Infective Agents