Comparing health status between patients with COPD in primary, secondary and tertiary care

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Sep 8;30(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-00196-7.

Abstract

In this study, we compare health status between COPD patients treated in three different care levels in the Netherlands and assess determinants that influence their health status. We applied the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument to measure eight health status subdomains in primary (n = 289), secondary (n = 184) and tertiary care (n = 433) COPD patient cohorts. Proportions of patients with severe problems in ≥3 subdomains are 47% in primary, 71% in secondary and 94% in tertiary care. Corrected for patient characteristics, differences between the care levels are statistically significant for nearly all health status subdomains. The pooled cohort data show female sex, age, FEV1 % predicted and BMI to be determinants of one or more subdomains. We conclude that the proportion of COPD patients with severe health status problems is substantial, not just in tertiary care but also in primary and secondary care. Use of detailed health status information may support patient-tailored COPD care.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Volume
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Primary Health Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / physiopathology
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / therapy*
  • Quality of Life
  • Secondary Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Tertiary Healthcare / statistics & numerical data*