Coming to grips with seemingly conflicting results in programme evaluation: the devil's in the detail
BMJ Qual Saf
.
2021 Jan;30(1):70-71.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012118.
Epub 2020 Sep 8.
Authors
Benjamin Daniels
1
,
Sallie-Anne Pearson
2
,
Nicholas A Buckley
3
,
Claudia Bruno
2
,
Andrea Schaffer
2
,
Helga Zoega
2
4
Affiliations
1
Medicine Policy Research Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia b.daniels@unsw.edu.au.
2
Medicine Policy Research Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
3
Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Group, The University of Sydney Discipline of Pharmacology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
4
Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
PMID:
32900853
DOI:
10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012118
No abstract available
Keywords:
attitudes; audit and feedback; checklists.
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Australia
Humans
Proton Pump Inhibitors*
Substances
Proton Pump Inhibitors