Seasonal occurrence and removal of organophosphate esters in conventional and advanced drinking water treatment plants

Water Res. 2020 Nov 1:186:116359. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116359. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

Abstract

In this study, the fate of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in conventional and advanced drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) was investigated in field scale. In addition, the risk of OPEs by drinking water was assessed. The average total OPE concentrations in raw and treated water were lower in the rainy season (94.3 and 57.1 ng/L, respectively) than dry season (163 and 84.2 ng/L, respectively). Advanced DWTPs showed better removal efficiencies of major OPEs rather than those in conventional DWTPs. The average removal rates for two chlorinated OPEs, including tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate (TCEP) and tris(1-chloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TCIPP), were negative (TCEP: -87%, TCIPP: -41%) for a conventional DWTP but positive (TCEP: 46%, TCIPP: 49%) for advanced DWTPs using granular activated carbon filtration. The average removal rates for advanced DWTPs were statistically higher for the alkyl/aryl OPEs, tri-n-butyl phosphate (TNBP: 67%) and tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP: 63%), than those for the conventional DWTPs (TNBP: 21%, TBOEP: 25%). The hazardous quotient (HQ) of major OPEs were lower for advanced DWTPs and water irrigated from upstream sties/reservoir compared to that of conventional DWTPs and water irrigated from downstream sites. We believe that this is the first comparison of OPE removal efficiencies achieved in conventional and advanced DWTPs.

Keywords: Drinking water treatment plant; Organophosphate esters; Removal; Risk assessment; Seasonal occurrence.

MeSH terms

  • China
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Esters
  • Flame Retardants* / analysis
  • Organophosphates
  • Seasons
  • Water Purification*

Substances

  • Esters
  • Flame Retardants
  • Organophosphates