Background: Surgeons continue to seek indicators for the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Many recent studies have assessed the value of d-dimer in diagnosing PJI because of the close relation between the d-dimer value and inflammation. However, the conclusions from different studies are still disputed. Methods: We searched for studies published from 2011 to March 2020 using online databases and screened studies based on the inclusion criteria. Diagnostic parameters of d-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were calculated, including the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the curve (AUC). In addition, univariate meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of nine studies with 431 Patients with PJI were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of d-dimer were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.89), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83), 12 (95% CI, 5-30), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88), respectively. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of CRP were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.73-0.83), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87), respectively, whereas those of ESR were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60-0.74), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.88), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), respectively. Conclusions: d-dimer determination had similar performance to CRP and ESR in the diagnosis of PJI and may be a good addition to the current diagnostic criteria.
Keywords: d-dimer; diagnosis; meta-analysis; peri-prosthetic joint infection.