A single bout of coordination training does not lead to EIH in young healthy men - a RCT

Abstract

Objectives: Physical activity can lead to hypoalgesic effects and is often recommended as part of multidisciplinary pain management. Based on the idea, that in future specific and more differentiated sports therapeutic interventions could be used for a multidisciplinary pain management, various type of sports and their effects on pain sensitivity should be analysed. Whereas endurance as well as strengthening exercises are associated with a decrease in pain sensitivity in healthy people as well as people with chronic pain states, the effects of a specific coordination training (CT) on pain sensitivity have not yet been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, aim of the present study was to examine if a single bout of CT leads to exercised-induced hypoalgesia in young healthy men.

Methods: Thirty five healthy men (mean age 27 ± 3 years) were examined in a randomised crossover design before and after a single bout of 45-min CT and a 45-min resting session as control condition by means of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST). The QST is a validated instrument to assess the function of the somatosensory system, by applying thermal and mechanical stimuli. By doing so, various detection and pain thresholds were determined at the dorsum of one foot. Exercises of CT were chosen to generate high proprioceptive input for the ankle joints.

Results: Analysis of the QST data in respect of the factors group (CT/control condition), time (pre/post) and stimuli (parameter of QST) revealed no statistically significant main effects of a single bout of CT on somatosensory system, neither for the factors group*time (p=0.51), nor the factors group*time*stimuli (p=0.32). All stimuli remained constant in the course of both conditions (e.g. mean ± sd of heat pain threshold pre/post in °C: coordination: 44.7 ± 3.1/44.8 ± 2.9; rest: 45.5 ± 3.0/44.9 ± 3.0).

Conclusions: In this setting, a single bout of CT had no effect on the somatosensory system in young healthy men. Therefore, this specific CT did not lead to an exercised-induced hypoalgesia in healthy people. Intensity of sensory input during training intervention might be too low to generate analgesic effects in a non-pathological altered somatosensory system of young healthy men. Further research is needed to clarify if a CT can induce exercised-induced hypoalgesia in people with pathological alterations of the somatosensory system. In addition, it has to examined if analgesic effects can be induced by changing the intensity of CT in healthy people. Detailed knowledge regarding the effects of different training interventions on pain modulation is needed to completely understand the mechanism of exercised-induced hypoalgesia.

Keywords: coordination; exercise induced hypoalgesia; exercise training; pain; quantitative sensory testing.