How I do it - Second stage revision total knee arthroplasty

Knee. 2020 Dec;27(6):2007-2012. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Abstract

Background: Infection is a potentially devastating complication following primary total knee arthroplasty, and the traditional gold-standard treatment for chronic prosthetic joint infection has been in the form of a two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. This involves a first stage - removal of all implants and infected material, with implantation of a temporary spacer - followed by a second stage which includes reimplantation with a definitive prosthesis.

Indications: Although the outcomes of single-stage and two-stage revision arthroplasty surgeries are similar, there are certain indications such as atypical or more virulent organisms, patient factors and soft tissue factors that would favour a two-stage approach.

Surgical technique: The second stage revision procedure consists of explantation of the spacer with a debridement and synovectomy. Further samples are sent for microbiological analysis. Once the surgical field is clean and lavaged, the definitive prosthesis is implanted.

Conclusions: A second stage revision total knee arthroplasty is a reliable procedure for the treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection. There is a significant re-revision rate, predominantly due to recurrent deep infection.

Keywords: Infection; Prosthetic joint infection; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Second stage.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / adverse effects*
  • Device Removal
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery*
  • Reoperation / methods

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents