Performance of the German version of the PARCA-R questionnaire as a developmental screening tool in two-year-old very preterm infants

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0236289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236289. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Objective: To validate and test a German version of the revised Parent Report of Children's Abilities questionnaire (PARCA-R).

Methods: Multicentre cross-sectional study. Parents of infants born <32 gestational weeks, completed the PARCA-R within three weeks before the follow-up assessment of their child at age two years. Infants were assessed using the Mental Development Index (MDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development 2nd edition (BSID-II). Pearson correlation between the Parent Report Composite (PRC) of the PARCA-R and MDI was tested. The optimal PRC cut-off for predicting moderate-to-severe mental delay, defined as MDI<70, was identified through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: PARCA-R and BSID-II data were collected from 154 consecutive infants [51% girls, mean (SD) gestational age 29.0 (2.0) weeks, birth weight 1174 (345) grams] at 23.2 (1.6) months of corrected age. The PRC score [70.5 (31.1)] correlated with the MDI [92.2 (17.3); R = 0.54; p < 0.0001]. The optimal PRC cut-off for identifying mental delay was 44 with 0.81 (0.54-0.96) sensitivity (95%-CI), 0.81 (0.74-0.87) specificity, area under the ROC curve of 0.840 (0.729-0.952).

Conclusion: The German version of the PARCA-R had good validity with the BSID-II and PCR scores < 44 proved optimal discriminatory power for the identification of mental delay at two years of corrected age.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child Development*
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Premature* / physiology
  • Male
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders / epidemiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Switzerland / epidemiology

Grants and funding

EP was was supported by the Anna Müller Grocholski Foundation (https://neu2017.amg-stiftung.ch). GN was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant: PZOOP3_161146; http://www.snf.ch). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.