Safety assessment of all-steel-type attached lifting scaffold based on grey Euclidean theory

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238074. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

To reduce the incidence of safety accidents during the construction of all-steel-type attached lifting scaffolds and address the research gaps in related fields, in this study a theoretical model of trajectory crossing accidents was coupled with an analysis of similar safety accidents to determine the causes of accidents in the construction of high-rise buildings using steel-type attached lifting scaffolds. To do so, a safety evaluation index system covering all steel-type attached lifting scaffolds that comprises five first-level indicators and 17 second-level indicators was established. The first-level indicators cover three risk dimensions: unsafe human behavior (personal operations), unsafe conditions (material performance, structural calculation, components and connections), and lack of management (safety management). A combined multi-agent-based modeling (MABM) method and structural entropy weight were used to calculate a comprehensive weight for better alignment of the weight calculation results with objective laws. A safety assessment model for an all-steel-type attached lifting scaffolding was constructed using grey relative Euclidean weighted correlation theory to enable the calculation of a grey-to-Euclidean weighted correlation degree that directly correlates with the degree of security. Using the established assessment model, four projects were subjected to a safety evaluation, with the results validating the model by revealing that its output was consistent with the actual security situation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Construction Materials*
  • Mechanical Phenomena
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Safety*
  • Steel*

Substances

  • Steel

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 51908452, 51808424, 51677879, 51478384, and 51178386 to HL. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.