Biological evaluation of bone substitute

Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Nov:510:544-555. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

Abstract

Critical-sized defects (CSDs) caused by trauma, tumor resection, or skeletal abnormalities create a high demand for bone repair materials (BRMs). Over the years, scientists have been trying to develop BRMs and evaluate their efficacy using numerous developed methods. BRMs are characterized by osteogenesis and angiogenesis promoting properties, the latter of which has rarely been studied in vitro and in vivo. While blood vessels are required to provide nutrients. Bone mass maintains a dynamic balance under the joint action of osteolytic and osteogenic activity in which monocytes differentiate into osteolytic cells, and osteoprogenitor cells differentiate into osteogenic cells. This review would be helpful for inexperienced researchers as well as present a comprehensive overview of methods used to investigate the effect of BRMs on osteogenic cells, osteolytic cells, and blood vessels, as well as their biocompatibility and biological performance. This review is expected to facilitate further research and development of new BRMs.

Keywords: Angiogenesis; Biosafety; Bone repair materials; Cell culture; Experimental animal; Osteogenesis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bone Density
  • Bone Substitutes*
  • Cell Differentiation
  • Osteogenesis

Substances

  • Bone Substitutes