A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy

J Surg Res. 2020 Dec:256:413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.052. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Background: We compared cosmetic outcomes, pain intensity, and costs between dermal stapling and intradermal suturing in patients who underwent thyroidectomy through cervical incision.

Patients and methods: In total, 40 patients were randomly assigned to undergo thyroidectomy through a low cervical incision and dermal closure using either absorbable staples (n = 20, staple group) or interrupted intradermal sutures (n = 20, suture group). Wound complications, cosmetic outcomes (modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale [SBSES] and Manchester Scar Scale [MSS]), and pain intensity (visual analog scale) were assessed at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The difference in total "wound-closure cost" between the two groups was also analyzed.

Results: There were no wound-related complications and no significant differences in SBSES or MSS scores between the two groups (P = 0.609 and P = 0.141, respectively). However, the staple group had significantly higher SBSES scores, compared to the suture group, at 24 wk postoperatively (4.06 ± 0.94 versus 3.26 ± 1.24; P = 0.030, respectively); MSS scores were significantly lower in the staple group than in the suture group at 24 wk postoperatively (6.72 ± 1.27 versus 8.16 ± 2.17, respectively; P = 0.028). Visual analog scale scores were significantly lower in the suture group than in the staple group (P = 0.038). The total wound-closure cost was significantly higher in the staple group than in the suture group (137.10 ± 8.39 versus 81.79 ± 19.95 USD; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: When dermal staples were used, wound complications were absent and long-term cosmetic outcomes were superior; however, pain intensity was higher and the cost was greater, although healing was significantly more rapid, compared to intradermal sutures. Closure using absorbable dermal staples may be safe and effective for cervical incisions during thyroid surgery. Further studies with larger number of participants are needed to confirm our findings.

Keywords: Cervical incision; Dermal staples; Intradermal suture; Open thyroidectomy; Wound closure.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cicatrix / diagnosis*
  • Cicatrix / etiology
  • Cicatrix / prevention & control
  • Esthetics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis*
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Prospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surgical Stapling / adverse effects*
  • Surgical Stapling / economics
  • Suture Techniques / adverse effects*
  • Suture Techniques / economics
  • Thyroidectomy / adverse effects*
  • Thyroidectomy / economics
  • Thyroidectomy / methods
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing
  • Young Adult