Strategies to maximise patient comfort during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy - A randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Background/purpose of study: We aim to assess if distraction techniques improve patient comfort tolerability of SWL.

Methods: We carried out a prospective randomised controlled trial of SWL-naïve patients attending for treatment. Patients were randomised into three groups and offered oral analgesia as standard of care. Group 1 (n = 19) received stress balls to squeeze during treatment. Group 2 (n = 19) listened to music during treatment. Group 3 (n = 17) received standard of care only. All patients completed a validated health anxiety inventory score prior to treatment. All patients completed a validated pain questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) after treatment. Primary outcomes were completion of SWL treatment and pain score results.

Results: 55 patients attending for SWL were randomised. There was no difference in stone size or position, presence of a stent, height or weight between the groups. VAS scores were lower in controls compared to Group 1 (1.93 vs 3.69, p = 0.08). On subgroup analysis of non-anxious patients, pain questionnaire scores were lower in controls compared to Group 1 (2.58 vs 4.77, p = 0.06). VAS scores were lower in patients who received optional analgesia alone than in patients who received stress balls alone (1.92 vs 4.07, p = 0.05). Across all subgroups, pain scores were lower in the control group compared to the distraction groups, but did not achieve significance.

Conclusions: In conclusion, distraction techniques should not replace standard of care for analgesia during SWL. This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT03379922).

Keywords: Analgesia; Calculi; Lithotripsy.