The effect of anatomical variables and use of the Lifts system on hearing outcomes after implantation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device in bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Aug 8;49(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00452-3.

Abstract

Background: Malformations of the temporal bone present different challenges to the implantation of a transcutaneous active bone conduction device, such as Bonebridge (Med-el, Innsbruck, Austria). This study aims to describe the benefits of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in preoperative assessment and to analyze whether characteristics of the mastoid process, intraoperative compression of the dura or sigmoid sinus, and the use of the Lifts system, lead to differences in audiological performance after implantation.

Methods: We examined 110 cases of congenital microtia. The structure of the temporal bone was examined using HRCT and a 3D simulation software program. The mean anteroposterior mastoid bone thickness from the external auditory canal to the sigmoid sinus was measured (a measurement referred to as "AP", hereafter). Sound field threshold (SFT), speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise, and word recognition score (WRS) in quiet, before and after implantation, were also measured. Independent variables were recorded in all patients: mastoid type (well pneumatized or poorly pneumatized), the presence of dural or sigmoid sinus compression, and the use of the Lifts system.

Results: We found that the mean AP in the non-compression group was 16.2 ± 2.3 mm and in the compression group, 13.1 ± 2.9 mm (p < 0.001). We analyzed the hearing improvement of patients grouped by mastoid development, dural or sigmoid sinus compression, and use of the Lifts system, and found that these factors did not interact and that they had no influence on the hearing outcomes (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The AP dimension in the non-compression group was significantly larger than that in the compression group. This finding combined with the ROC curve analysis revealed the AP dimension was a high-accuracy predictor of potential surgical complications involving the dura and sigmoid sinus compression. Further analysis revealed that there was no interaction between the chosen variables: mastoid type, dural or sigmoid sinus compression, and the use of the Lifts system, and that all of these factors had no significant impact on hearing performance. Bonebridge was shown to produce effective and stable bone conduction and to improve patients' hearing performance.

Keywords: 3D simulation; Bonebridge; Congenital microtia; Hearing outcomes; Preoperative evaluation; Transcutaneous bone conduction device.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Congenital Microtia / surgery
  • Congenital Microtia / therapy*
  • Female
  • Hearing Aids*
  • Hearing Loss, Bilateral
  • Hearing Loss, Conductive / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mastoid / anatomy & histology
  • Mastoid / diagnostic imaging
  • Preoperative Care
  • ROC Curve
  • Temporal Bone / abnormalities*
  • Temporal Bone / surgery
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Young Adult