Background: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) measures mean arterial pressure (MAP) then extrapolates systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) values. Pediatric guidelines recommend using calculated systolic and diastolic BP rather than measured MAP for diagnosis of ambulatory hypertension (HTN). The 95th percentile BP that defines ambulatory HTN is higher in some children than thresholds used to define ambulatory HTN in adults.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent 24-h ABPM. The level of agreement in ambulatory HTN diagnosis using MAP vs. systolic/diastolic BP was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Similar analysis was done to assess agreement in HTN diagnosis using adult vs. pediatric criteria for males taller than 165 cm.
Results: A total of 263 ABPM studies were included. There was good agreement for diagnosis of HTN using MAP or systolic/diastolic BP (k = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.67-0.83). However, there was disagreement between the methods in 12% (n = 31) of subjects. Similarly, there was good agreement (k = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56-0.85) between pediatric and adult criteria for HTN diagnosis. Nineteen patients were found to be hypertensive (9 using MAP criteria, 10 using adult criteria) who would not have met ambulatory HTN criteria using current pediatric guidelines.
Conclusions: Inclusion of MAP along with systolic and diastolic BP in ABPM analysis alongside using adult criteria for diagnosing HTN in male children ≥ 165 cm may improve accuracy of pediatric HTN diagnosis and reduce false negative rate. Larger studies are needed to assess the clinical validity of these results. Graphical abstract.
Keywords: ABPM; Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Children; Hypertension evaluation; Mean arterial pressure; Pediatric hypertension; Threshold.