Background: Current standard skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infections are ineffective to eradicate all skin-colonizing bacteria. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown bactericidal effects in vitro, but no clinical study with improvements in skin antisepsis has been documented.
Methods: We investigated the effect of methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT versus no PDT for skin antisepsis treatment (povidone-iodine/alcohol) in the groin of 10 healthy participants. Skin swabs were taken at baseline, immediately after PDT, and after skin antisepsis treatment to cultivate bacteria. At day 7 and 21, bacterial cultures were repeated before and after antisepsis treatment without PDT. Skin biopsies were performed to examine the grade of inflammation.
Results: Skin-colonizing bacteria were found in all 20 participants at baseline sampling. Immediately after MAL-PDT, skin was sterile in 7 (70%) participants before and in all 10 (100%) participants after skin antisepsis treatment. In contrast, we found skin-colonizing bacteria in 5 (50%) participants of the control group receiving only skin antisepsis. After 7 and 21 days, skin sterility was similar to the baseline. We observed slight perivascular inflammation with lymphocytes and eosinophils without changes in the histomorphology of eccrine or sebaceous glands in skin biopsies. PDT was generally well tolerated except for localized redness.
Conclusion: MAL-PDT with skin antisepsis treatment sterilized skin immediately after its use but did not maintain sterility 7-21 days post-treatment. Due to local side effects, further clinical studies with less intensive PDT conditions or other photosensitizers are needed before PDT is integrated into clinical practice.
Keywords: Bacteria; MAL-PDT; Photodynamic therapy; Skin antisepsis.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.