Conducting Goals-of-Care Discussions Takes Less Time Than Imagined

JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Dec;16(12):e1499-e1506. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00743. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the length of encounter during visits where goals-of-care (GoC) discussions were expected to take place.

Methods: Oncologists from community, academic, municipal, and rural hospitals were randomly assigned to receive a coaching model of communication skills to facilitate GoC discussions with patients with newly diagnosed advanced solid-tumor cancer with a prognosis of < 2 years. Patients were surveyed after the first restaging visit regarding the quality of the GoC discussion on a scale of 0-10 (0 = worst; 10 = best), with ≥ 8 indicating a high-quality GoC discussion. Visits were audiotaped, and total encounter time was measured.

Results: The median face-to-face time oncologists spent during a GoC discussion was 15 minutes (range, 10-20 minutes). Among the different hospital types, there was no significant difference in encounter time. There was no difference in the length of the encounter whether a high-quality GoC discussion took place or not (15 v 14 minutes; P = .9). If there was imaging evidence of cancer progression, the median encounter time was 18 minutes compared with 13 minutes for no progression (P = .03). In a multivariate model, oncologist productivity, patient age, and Medicare coverage affected duration of the encounter.

Conclusion: Oncologists can complete high-quality GoC discussions in 15 minutes. These data refute the common misperception that discussing such matters with patients with advanced cancer requires significant time.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Goals
  • Humans
  • Medicare
  • Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Oncologists*
  • Patient Care Planning
  • United States