Objectives: To assess the diagnostic value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a diagnostic biomarker that can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant lung nodules (LNs).
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were reviewed from January 2000 to April 2020 for eligible studies. Stata v12.0 was used to conduct this meta-analysis.
Results: Our initial literature search identified 511 potentially relevant studies, of which 11 were ultimately included in the present meta-analysis. Ten studies were retrospective and only 1 study was prospective. Overall these studies incorporated 2760 patients and 2760 total LNs (1733 malignant, 1027 benign). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) values for these studies were 0.33 (95% CI: 0.20-0.49), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96), 3.96 (95% CI: 2.84-5.54), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87), and 5.42 (95% CI: 3.77-7.78), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) value was 0.77, consistent with moderate diagnostic accuracy. We detected significant heterogeneity when calculating pooled sensitivity (I2 = 95.9%, P = 0.00), specificity (I2 = 92.0%, P = 0.00), PLR (I2 = 61.7%, P = 0.00), NLR (I2 = 92.8%, P = 0.00), and DOR (I2 = 93.8%, P = 0.00). No significant evidence of publication bias was detected via Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (P = 0.371). Meta-regression analysis revealed different reference standards to be closely associated with both sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions: Serum CEA can achieve moderate diagnostic performance as a means of differentiating between malignant and benign LNs.
Keywords: Carcinoembryonic antigen; benign; lung nodule; malignancy; meta-analysis.